2019 BCCN Broomfield City Council Candidate Questionnaire

#1
Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories? 

Our children and seniors are struggling with multiple health issues, which mimic the health issues other communities have had, such as Erie.  Many reports of children with nosebleeds, people of all ages with and respiratory issues; Broomfielders and Adams County residents frequently report stinging, burning eyes, and difficulty breathing. At least one person reported a skin rash. Seniors in the community next to the Livingston pad cannot always even open windows or sit outside anymore. 

The scientists from CSU and Ajax Analytics reported to council that health complaints spiked when high toxicity operations were being done, and there is no question in their mind that one led to the other.  

In addition to health impacts, residents have reported feeling their house shaking, are impacted by odor, and severely increased truck traffic.

I have been closely involved with the impacted citizens, as the ward I currently represent on city council has been ground zero for residential fracking activity.

The impacts are as expected, and prove that fracking has no place next to homes, schools, drinking water, or in our open space.

#2
What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

I am absolutely and adamantly opposed to oil and gas development on our open spaces. Broomfield’s charter has an exemption that allows our open spaces to be repurposed for fracking without even having a public process, and I have fought to close that exemption. As mayor, leading the council to end this exemption is one of my top priorities.

We pay a self-imposed tax to buy open space. Turning that open space into some other use, without a public vote is nothing more than dirty slight of hand. 

In September council wanted to ask the people if you would like there to be a public process if we’re considering fracking on open space. It was to be a ballot issue you can vote yes or no on. But several council members killed the vote, so you won’t see it on the ballot.

A “Colorado Open Records Act request” for emails showed one of my opponents working with council members to kill that vote, because if it passed, he said it would help my campaign. After they killed it, he thanked them and said they had done a good job, and said it will help his campaign.

Time to protect open space as open space!

#3
What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

As Mayor of Broomfield, the changes that I would most like to implement are:

• Continue the push I have made as a council member and county commissioner, to eliminate fracking in the middle of our neighborhoods.
• As mayor I would maximize the local control granted under SB19-181 by using peer reviewed studies to set minimum setbacks. 
• Drilling would never be done unless there is irrefutable proof that it will not compromise people’s health or safety, or the environment.  
• Additionally, Broomfield has the legal right to set air quality standards that are HIGHER than the state’s. It just takes a mayor and council with the will to do it.

#4
What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

I am very supportive of SB-181 and I believe it should be fully leveraged by Broomfield’s next mayor and council, in order to take greater control of the oil and gas activity that has been disturbing our neighborhoods for years. 

SB19-181 will allow Broomfield to fully implement Question 301, which requires Broomfield’s city council to ensure health, safety and the environment are protected prior to approving any drilling. This has never been implemented and should have been. 

Since SB-181 allows cities and counties to prioritize health, safety and the environment above the extraction of minerals, it partners with SB-181 perfectly.

I want to implement SB-181 by establishing minimum setbacks based on current, peer reviewed studies that study whether fracking is safe. The setbacks would come straight from the data. And the data clearly shows fracking is not safe anywhere near homes, schools, drinking water or parks.

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

There is no one on Broomfield’s city council pushing harder for transparency than I am.

When I was elected to Broomfield’s city council, almost every vote was unanimous across 10 council members. Issues were discussed in private. Debates and discussions and changes…in private. Then a unanimous public vote to support the decision. 

I’m told it was better for Broomfield because showing a united front publicly was better for everyone. But when it’s private, the public loses the debate, and what the real vote was, and who was on which side, and why. I speak the truth from the dais and have gotten more meetings streamed and televised. 

As mayor, I aim to expand our stakeholder process for the approval of any new industrial projects by SEEKING resident’s input, and by REQUIRING a public process for fracking on open land, or anywhere.

#6
Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

The health and safety of Broomfield’s citizens is my top priority, and it is one of the primary reasons I became involved in local politics in the first place. Unfortunately, the old state regulations and a pro-fracking majority on city council has made progress difficult. With the new legislation, and ideally a new health-and-safety majority on council, I’d maximize the local control SB-181 authorized to protect these people. There would be no projects approved near people.

#7
What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield? 

With rigs rising over our neighborhoods, and an exemption in our charter that allows O&G development on our open spaces without a public process, the extraction industry is clearly intent on continuing to profit in Broomfield–regardless of the huge impact to our health or safety. My opponents intend to help them do that. I don’t.

The passage of SB-181 earlier this year gave Colorado municipalities greater control over oil & gas activity, and I intend to absolutely maximize those new authorities to protect the city that I love so much. But the oil & gas industry does not want that to happen. In Broomfield’s last municipal election, the industry spent nearly half a million dollars to defeat pro-health-and-safety candidates and initiatives.

With your support, we can win this race, and we can finally take Broomfield back from the industry.

#1

Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

On City Council we have heard stories from residents of our northern communities regarding health problems due to poor air quality. I have also heard stories from friends of decreased home values in the Anthem neighborhoods.

#2

What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space?

I am firmly against oil and gas operations in our parks and open space. On City Council we are currently working on strengthening our O&G regulations. I support changing our zoning classifications so that oil and gas is no longer allowed as a special use within our parks and open spaces.

#3

What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

As mentioned above, we are currently working on strengthening our oil and gas regulations. I support increasing our setbacks so that operations are far enough away from our residential neighborhoods and schools. I also support strengthening our air quality, water quality and noise level standards. We also need to work on our enforcement of these regulations.

#4

What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

SB 181 is incredibly important, as it give municipalities like Bromfield control over O&G activities within their community. As mentioned above, we are taking advantage of this power by strengthening our oil and gas regulations. I support changing our zoning by limiting O&G operations to industrial areas and increasing our setbacks so that operations are far enough away from our residential neighborhoods and schools. I also support strengthening our air quality, water quality and noise level standards.

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis?

The City has spent a considerable amount of time and energy making sure its residents are informed of oil and gas related matters. This includes hiring staff dedicated to O&G matters, implementing a robust and regularly updated website, meeting with impacted residents, and holding several community meetings. Although there appears to be a significant amount of information available, I am always open to hearing any concerns regarding transparency on this or any other issues. 

#6

Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority?

I will continue to work on strengthening our current O&G regulations as outlined above. I also will work toward better enforcement of these regulations to keep operators accountable for any breaches.

#7

What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield?

Please be sure that the City is working hard to protect the health and safety of its citizens. SB 181 has given us significant power over O&G operations within our community. Over the next year I intend to continue to work toward stronger regulations and better enforcement of these regulations. 

#1

 Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

 Yes, I have observed several impacts from the new oil and gas development on the north end of our community. Specifically, I have witnessed increased truck traffic and residents with genuine health concerns that are likely connected to the new oil and gas development. I have also heard stories from residents about severe air quality issues that may have resulted in increased instances of nosebleeds, asthma-related ailments, burning eyes and throats, and overall respiratory difficulties.

#2

 What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

 I am vehemently opposed to allowing oil and gas development on our taxpayer-funded open space. This type of development is antithetical to the purpose of our community’s beloved open space program.

 #3

 What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

 The City and County of Broomfield can fully utilize charter amendment 301 and the new expanded local control granted under SB19-181 to prioritize public health and safety. As we rewrite our oil and gas rules in Broomfield we can include many new requirements for future oil and gas development such as increased setbacks, noise and traffic mitigation plans and requirements, the highest engine and drilling mud standards, increased bonding for future clean up and potential emergency situations, road and infrastructure impact fees, and increased labor standards and certification requirements. 

#4

 What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

 As stated in the previous question, there are many specific avenues we can pursue to leverage SB19-181. As the courts begin ruling on the limitations of SB19-181, we will have a better perspective on how we can best utilize this new authority. As a City Council Member, I will always work with citizen and stakeholder groups like Broomfield Concerned to best utilize our local authority to protect our environment and public health. 

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

I have a lot of faith in Broomfield’s new city manager to keep citizens apprised of new information and impacts. One way that I think we can improve public engagement on this issue and other issues is by having more council meetings. Currently, the agendas are so long, and frequently oil and gas related issues are put at the end of the agenda. This current situation discourages public involvement and makes it harder for citizens to follow what’s going on. We need more meetings with shorter agendas so that citizens and elected officials alike can be informed, engaged, and focused.  

 #6

 Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

I’m disappointed that we needed a charter amendment to prioritize public health and safety. I’m even more disappointed that the City and County of Broomfield has still largely ignored the leadership committee of Broomfield Health and Safety First. If I am fortunate enough to serve on Broomfield City Council, every decision that I make will be based on how it will impact the residents of Broomfield. Health and safety will be my top priority when it comes to all issues, even those not related to oil and gas development. 

 #7

 What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield? 

 Broomfield is the reason that SB19-181 was passed. We were the example of how a combination of technological advancements in the oil and gas industry, population growth, and completely antiquated state laws could adversely impact a community. The oil and gas project near Anthem has cost the City and County of Broomfield hundreds of thousands of dollars, damaged our relationships regionally with our neighbors, and adversely impacted residents with traffic, forced pooling, and very real health concerns. On City Council, I will work hard to prioritize our health, safety, and quality of life.

#1
Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

I’ve been reaching out to impacted citizens in both Broomfield and unincorporated Adams County, regarding both the Interchange and Livingston fracking projects. Some of the impacts shared with me have been gushing nosebleeds by children, persistent cough, headaches, lung and heart issues. People in the area now keep their windows closed because of the smell and how it impacts their breathing. People stopped taking outdoor walks. And some people have had to invest in indoor air purifiers so their children stop coughing at night.

#2
What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

O&G development has no place in Open Space. Taxpayers paid for the Open Space to be preserved for future generations. That means no drilling, logging, mining, or fracking on the Open Space.

#3
What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

With the State passage of SB19-181, which changed public policy, all existing contracts and MOU’s are now subject for review. With SB19-181 and the 2017 Broomfield City Charter Amendment 301, the City and County of Broomfield can now fully enforce 301. We can extend the moratorium on all new permits. We can halt all existing projects. And we can ban fracking in Broomfield. The science is clear, there is no safe way to frack, it’s time to stop pretending we can safely regulate this industry.  

#4
What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law? 

More important than my perception, is the legal precedence it now sets, and the room to operate within that legal precedence. Broomfield has the additional layer of City Charter Amendment 301, which lets us put Health & Safety first. Combined with the local authority granted by SB 181, all of the previous contracts and MOU’s are now subject for review. According to outside council, we can even go for a ban. To be clear, I’m not interested in just mitigating the damage AFTER it occurs, I’m interested in stopping fracking. 

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

Transparency is literally part of my platform. How about we start with full disclosure of any fiscal entanglements by the City Employees, the Council, and the Mayor. Far too often there are conflicts of interest that continue to go unnoticed, from Council decisions to pushback from city employees. Making the daily reports that go out, be made available to the constituents. There are constituents that have backgrounds and degrees that can both understand and translate the data. The new City Manager is already moving forward with City transparency, based on the recent televised meeting after the leak was found in Anthem Highlands. Create a more robust air monitoring system, similar to INSTAAR, that measures in real-time, where the constituents can access the data online. 

#6
Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

Health and Safety is my first priority. I’ve been fighting for Broomfield’s Health and Safety since 2012. Start by enforcing 301, and creating an enforcement mechanism. And revisit all of the contracts and MOU’s that were created before SB 181. I would like to create the position of a City “Sustainability Manager” similar the the program Lakewood created four years ago. 

#7
What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield? 

It’s time to end the practice of fracking. It has no place in our city and county. It is poisoning our land, air, water, and people. The “Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking” sixth edition, clearly outlines the scientific peer-reviewed dangers of fracking. It’s time to engage and employ 21st century options, while Broomfield is still a place worth living. 

#1
Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

I have many friends and former (and hopefully future) constituents affected by the recent development. The visual impact is striking and those affected have myriad concerns about health, safety and environmental impact. Such worries about the well-being of one’s self, family and neighbors has an immediate impact on mental and physical health, along with the longer-term risks associated with development.   

#2
What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

All public space and facilities are citizen funded, so the specific source of public funds invested in open space neither weakens nor strengthens the absolute importance of citizens concerns and good governance. I do not want any development in open space, except for parks, recreation, trails, wildlife sanctuary, limited agriculture and facilities that support them. My desired limitation goes beyond oil and gas to include all industrial uses. 

#3
What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

I am committed to dedicating more necessary resources to minimize the impact of such development, including imposing strong safety standards and procedures, robust inspection and enforcement of health, safety and environmental standards, thorough closing/capping of wells and reclamation.

#4
What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

I supported SB181 and will commit to advocating for as much control of development type and location as we can under the law.

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

The city has an obligation to conduct its business in public and communicate openly with all citizens, particularly those directly affected by anything before council. There are only a very few circumstances involving contracts or personnel matters that require executive session but even those require candid disclosure of the outcomes. Prior to my first term on council, I served on the Board of Colorado Common Cause because I believe strongly in open and accountable government. I advocated for more transparency, including broadcasting study sessions, and will continue to do so.

#6
Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

Health and safety is always the first priority in considering any issue before council. The most important step is to include a health and safety analysis and impact in every council action to ensure its deliberate discussion and consideration. While this necessary thoughtfulness includes oil and gas, it also extends to other industrial development, broader sustainability issues, school safety, traffic, trails, crime prevention, mental health services and many more. 

#7
What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield? 

I will work tirelessly with council to ensure that we stop the hemorrhaging with oil and gas development through our ability to restrict new development, monitor and enforce strict requirements on existing development, and guarantee the thorough capping and reclamation of wells. 

#1
Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

Since June 2016, I have been in continual communication with impacted citizens living in residential neighborhoods near Extraction’s oil and gas development in Broomfield.  My work as a grassroots leader to protect Colorado residents’ health, safety and mineral rights began when my neighborhood first received a surprising mineral lease offer.  After learning that the regulations for oil and gas development were not designed to protect Colorado residents, I have been on the front lines in order to protect citizens’ health and safety at Broomfield City Council, the State Legislature and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC).  For three years, I have been regularly participating at Broomfield City Council meetings, communicating questions to Staff, and meeting with Council members to represent the concerns of impacted residents regarding the 84 well Extraction Oil and Gas development.

Immediately after drilling began first at the Interchange B Pad in April 2019, residents nearby voiced their opposition to Extraction’s usage of the odorous, carcinogenic drilling mud Gibson D822 and I joined them at City Council.  In response to complaints of lung irritation, watery eyes and nosebleeds, Extraction added a neutralizer which did not eliminate the underlying volatile organic compounds or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposing them to short-term health impacts and long-term cancer risk.  I joined nearby residents to meet with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) near the pad.  Unfortunately, the drilling mud did not get changed until Extraction began to use it at the Livingston Pad and a larger volume of residents complained.  I helped educate impacted residents near the Livingston Pad on filing complaints and again spoke at Council about health impacts.

With drilling on the Livingston Pad now in process, Wildgrass residents have had to close their windows due to excessive noise and children are unable to sleep at night.  Wildgrass residents have used their own meters and reported readings to the City, a process encouraged by those of us who are Wildgrass leaders.

Wildgrass residents have also been forced to have their property rights leased to Extraction Oil and Gas in the COGCC process of forced pooling.  I joined with Rep. Matt Gray (D-33) to secure passage of SB18-230 Modify Laws Drilling Units Pooling Orders when there was split party control in the State Legislature.  I also advocated for further reform of forced pooling regulations in SB19-181 Protect Public Welfare Oil and Gas Operations.

#2
What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

While canvassing, I have frequently heard residents state that Broomfield’s abundance of citizen-funded open space is what attracted them to live here.  They truly appreciate that the CCOB Open Space and Trails Department has as its mission to “acquire open space and create a comprehensive trail system that allows for the enjoyment of the outdoors and promotes a healthy environment for people, nature, and community.”

Residents’ statements about their love of open space are quickly followed by equally resolute statements that 

they do not want oil and gas drilling anywhere on or near their citizen-funded open space.  They are very aware that, in negotiating the Operator Agreement with Extraction, Broomfield chose to put the Northwest A & B Pads on open space and allow Extraction’s access road to cross it.  This habitat is currently a painful sight that will require much oversight in order to restore the ecosystem over decades.  

I was representing the voices of those whom I had heard at their doors when I strongly supported putting the charter amendment proposed in Ordinance 2095 on the November ballot.  It would have caused a “change of use” trigger if open space were proposed to be used for mineral extraction, as it would have closed a current exception in Charter Section 18.3(b)(3) (B). As described in Charter Section 18.3(b)(1), any change of use proposed for mineral extraction would then have caused a robust review process by the Open Space and Trails Advisory Committee at a public hearing with proper notice and then followed by an approval or denial by Council.  With the failure of the ordinance, the current process will unfortunately stay in place which allows for Staff members to decide if Open Space is used for mineral extraction.  

The people were denied the right to have their voices heard at the ballot box on this issue.  It was completely contrary to the democratic process and the reason why so many in Broomfield chose to live here.

#3
What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

Broomfield chose to negotiate an Operator Agreement with Extraction in October 2017 but has been reluctant to enforce its provisions to protect the health and safety of its residents unless impacted residents, including myself, pushed.  As a Ward 3 City Council Member with close contacts to impacted residents, I will use my thorough understanding of the Operator Agreement and Comprehensive Drilling Plan to encourage enforcement of those documents.     

In a September 5 letter to Extraction, CCOB demanded that Extraction not change its drilling mud from Neoflo 4633 back to Gibson D822 as Extraction proposed to do on August 29.  Neoflo 4633 had replaced Gibson D822 at the end of July for drilling the Livingston Pad wells after many resident complaints were received from those living near the Interchange B and Livingston Pads.  Also in the letter, CCOB demanded that Extraction continue to use Tier 4 engines in all drilling operations.  Extraction has never responded in writing to this demand letter, and CCOB Staff just continue to state that CCOB has a verbal agreement from Extraction.  The health and safety of Broomfield residents requires a written response from Extraction.

#4
What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

SB19-181 Protect Public Welfare Oil and Gas Operations was the cumulation of years of work by many Colorado organizations, along with those of us who are impacted residents living near oil and gas developments.  Since I have participated in the State legislative process, COGCC protests and COGCC rulemaking, I have a thorough understanding of where oil and gas regulations currently fall short and how Broomfield’s regulations can be enhanced with the greater local control provided by SB19-181.  

Broomfield has enacted a six-month moratorium on new oil and gas permitting to allow time to update its oil and gas regulations in light of SB19-181.  Some local regulatory changes should include consideration of cumulative impacts, increasing buffer and evacuation zones, increasing enforcement functions and fees, and changing code language from “practicable” to “necessary and reasonable.”  

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

Broomfield should provide an open communication channel so that residents can fully engage with their local government to work together for the good of the community.  Anthem Highlands residents have justifiably expressed their concern as to why they were not told sooner about the elevated level of methane found in routine soil gas testing near the plugged and abandoned Davis 43-6 Well.  The responsiveness of CCOB City Manager Jennifer Hoffman at the September 30 Community Meeting about this matter and the subsequent prompt follow-up on some concerns raised by impacted citizens was a step in the right direction. 

The inclusion of a series of Community Workshops as input to the revised oil and gas regulations is also valuable in expanding citizen participation.  I plan to similarly be responsive on all City matters to my constituents and intend to hold Town Halls in all areas and at various times throughout the ward.     

Many Council decisions on whether or not to press Extraction violations have happened in Council and Staff email chains or Executive Sessions.  I am looking forward to ensuring that more of these conversations happen with full public participation.  

#6
Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

I was a Ward signer for Charter Amendment 301 and was heavily involved in getting 301 on the ballot and passed in Nov 2017.  Since then, I have continued to be actively involved as a core member of Broomfield Health and Safety First, contributing to the advocacy efforts of the group to make sure that “Broomfield shall condition oil and gas development permits to require oil and gas development to only occur in a manner that does not adversely impact the health, safety and welfare of Broomfield’s residents…”     

In the summer of 2018, I joined two other impacted citizens living near the Livingston Pad to encourage CCOB to engage with Dr. Lisa McKenzie of CU to begin an extensive study of the health impacts of the Extraction oil and gas development.  These meetings involved both CCOB and the CDPHE to ensure a robust study and adequate funding sources.  Unfortunately, both CCOB and CDPHE stated that funding sources were not available.   

Now, residents living near the Extraction pads are experiencing unexplained nosebleeds, migraines and breathing problems.  CCOB air quality monitoring sensors are not adequately detecting the chemical exposures causing this, and CCOB Staff are beginning to consider that newer, more advanced technology must be utilized in the Air Quality Monitoring Program.  As a Council Member, I will ensure that there are upgrades to the Air Quality Monitoring Program when the contract is up for renewal in the first quarter of 2020.  

CCOB Staff are also moving toward hiring a toxicologist and epidemiologist to fully consider citizen health impacts.  After so many of us expressed our dismay at inadequate CCOB Staff responses to complaints filed by residents, I will work to ensure that these new CCOB employees fully understand their purpose to seriously engage with residents and explore all possible causes of the health impacts, never just taking the operator’s words to dismiss a citizen complaint.         

#7
What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield? 

In November 2017, Broomfield voters passed Charter Amendment 301, which ensures that oil and gas development does not adversely impact the health, safety and welfare of Broomfield’s residents.  This should be fully implemented under the local control provided by SB19-181.  Broomfield has enacted a six-month moratorium on new oil and gas permitting to allow time to update its oil and gas regulations in light of SB19-181.  I am currently participating as a resident in the efforts to revise these regulations in light of Charter Amendment 301 and SB19-181 and will continue to do so as a Council Member.  It is possible that the revised regulations may not allow for further oil and gas development in Broomfield based on Broomfield’s high density.   

On September 4, I attended the Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) Public Workshop held in Broomfield for the region.  SB19-181 Protect Public Welfare Oil and Gas Operations requires that the AQCC revise Regulation Number 7 Control of Ozone via Ozone Precursors and Control of Hydrocarbons via Oil and Gas Emissions.  When proposing new regulations, the AQCC is also required to do an initial economic impact analysis.  This economic analysis needs to quantify associated health costs for short-term and long-term health impacts supported by peer-reviewed scientific studies.  As a Broomfield Council Member, I intend to push for these full health costs to be included in the regulations since the City and County of Broomfield is a stakeholder in this process.  

Broomfield created its Environmental Stewardship Advisory Task Force (ESATF) in July 2018 and I hope to be a Council Member assigned to ESATF.  With the costs of renewable energy continuing to decline, I will bring to Council a full understanding of both the pressing need for action on renewable energy and the arguments for its economic feasibility.  I will support tentative ESATF proposals to incentivize Broomfield homeowners to install and operate solar energy.

With the May 28, 2019 signing of HB19-1314 Just Transition From Coal-Based Electrical Energy Economy, Colorado created a just transition advisory committee to develop a just transition plan for workers in the coal industry.  While this is a good first step, workers in the oil and gas industry should also be targeted in a future just transition plan.  I will encourage Broomfield to take advantage of any opportunity to promote retraining of workers through the Department of Health and Human Services.    

#1
Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

Yes, I have spoken directly with many residents who have indicated health effects such as first time nosebleeds, burning eyes, difficulty breathing and other health concerns. Residents do not want to jump to conclusions, but note the onset of symptoms coincided with the chemical smells and as operations began. I met some of these residents at their doors while canvassing and many were unaware of the CCOB health concern form. In addition, many residents have reported symptoms on the Anthem Underground, Nextdoor, and on Facebook Posts. I have reached out to residents when I see posts to ensure they are aware of the need to report their symptoms in order to better understand the situation.

When hydraulic fracturing began at the Interchange site, a visible black cloud rose continuously from behind the sound wall. It was through resident efforts and our knowledge of the details of the Operator Agreement and Comprehensive Drilling Plan that we were able to help build the momentum for the City to enforce the requirement that the operator use Tier 4 hydraulic fracturing pumps (engines) when they are commonly available. (These engines have been manufactured as Tier 4 since 2015 and are commonly available.) It is through reliance on the exact language of the agreement, and not allowing the wording to be manipulated, that becomes critical. 

When drilling operations began on the Livingston site and residents in multiple areas began experiencing health effects, we were in contact with the City and the COGCC to express concerns. This level of awareness was critical to the COGCC requiring the operator to change its drilling mud to one that is not carcinogenic. 

#2
What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

Broomfield places a priority on ensuring we have abundant recreational opportunities and contact with nature to improve quality of life and improve the health of our community through Parks and Recreational Areas, Open Space Areas, and Other Open Lands. The Broomfield Comprehensive Plan 2016 Update defines Open Space as “parcels intentionally protected from development and set aside for unstructured passive recreation and the appreciation of natural surroundings”.

In 2017, CCOB engaged in negotiations with Extraction which included a complex alternative siting analysis which looked at various distances from residential communities, parks, water sources, etc. The result of this analysis was a chart demonstrating which sites were better relative to other sites. Although there were no locations that could be considered protective of public health, safety, and the environment, there were sites that were relatively better than others. Despite sites on the undeveloped Mixed-Use/Commercial land which is known as the McWhinney Property being better options, in further negotiations the relatively better sites on the undeveloped lands were moved on to the Nordstrom and Davis Open Space which was originally purchased as a buffer from the Northwest Parkway and not intended for large-scale industrial operations.

Irreparable harm has already been done to the Nordstrom and Davis Open Space, as well as on the Open Lands near Anthem and Wildgrass. Moving forward, we must return to the original intent of our open lands which is “to acquire, to preserve and, where suitable, develop open lands for public use” where open lands include parks and recreational areas, open space areas, and other open lands. We must now add “restore” to our priorities for open space.

Proposition 301 which passed with 57% of the vote in 2017 changed the Broomfield Municipal code to require no adverse impacts from oil and gas development. This year the stated signed SB181 into law which changes the mission of the COGCC to “regulate the development and production of the natural resources of oil and gas in the state of Colorado in a manner that protects public health, safety, welfare, the environment and wildlife resources”. Broomfield is in the process of updating our oil and gas regulations and has the ability to enact regulations that are even more stringent than the state. Protection of the environment and wildlife resources will prove beneficial as we update our regulations to protect our open lands – including parks and open spaces.

#3
What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

First and foremost, we need to ensure that the health concerns are being analyzed and compared to the operations underway at the time of the complaint and look for patterns. We must also determine more effective monitoring techniques that account for sensitivity, calibration, and ensure we are measuring the right chemicals and compounds. The air quality results are only as good as the sensors that we are using. Extraction stated that their Broomfield development plan would actually clean our air. We should be seeing improvements in air quality. If air quality remains a concern, the City will need to request additional mitigation methods are utilized. 

#4
What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

The passage of SB181 provided much needed change to prioritize public health, safety, and the environment and wildlife resources above oil and gas operations. While the COGCC determines the new rules and regulations which will set the floor of protections at the state level, our local governments must also use their local control to ensure their residents are protected. Broomfield passed Proposition 301 which requires that oil and gas permits be conditioned to ensure no adverse impacts from oil and gas and when combined with SB181 which gives them that power, our City must enact regulations that are reasonable and necessary to protect public health and safety with a focus on the legislative intent of SB181 which states that local governments “be entitled to deference and allowed to use the precautionary principle to determine if a regulatory or land use decision is necessary and reasonable”.

We must update or local regulations prior to any new oil and gas development permits being processed. These new regulations must include the ability to deny permits, if the operations cannot be performed protective of public health, safety, and the environment. Although some have raised concerns about mineral takings, SB181 makes it clear that the nondevelopment of minerals is no longer considered waste.

#5
What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

Residents impacted by oil and gas development are engaged and want to be informed so they can make the best choices for the health and safety of their families. Extraction Oil and Gas has  been canvassing in the Anthem area with misleading information that has left the residents confused. In an effort to ensure CCOB understands the full impacts to the community, and that the residents are informed, CCOB should create an official communication for the residents that includes: information on signs and symptoms of health impacts related to oil and gas and how to report these to CCOB, the COGCC, and the CDPHE; full disclosure that the air quality monitoring program does not ensure no impacts; and a link to sign up for oil and gas updates.

The air quality monitoring program has limitations including the BME680 sensors which are low end sensors and per CDPHE guidance, “small sensor measurements are not robust enough for official comparisons to NAAQS or for assessing health risks”. With this recently released guidance from the CDPHE, it is necessary to reevaluate the air quality monitoring system to determine sensor types and measurement techniques that can provide accurate results. It is also important to note that there is no definitive data to indicate which chemicals, or combination of chemicals, results in health impacts.

In addition, many residents have filed reports of health concerns with the City only to receive a matter of fact email back from a representative of the City stating that the operations are in compliance. This response leaves the residents feeling frustrated. We need a better communication method in which residents are confident that their health concerns are being evaluated and compiled to better understand the situation.

#6
Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

I was a leader of Broomfield Health and Safety First which is the group that campaigned for this change to the Municipal Code. We worked hard to educate residents which resulted in the passage of Proposition 301 and the addition of the language to our Charter. Proposition 301 requires protection of public health, safety, and welfare. Senate Bill 181 provides the necessary local control, along with protection of public health, safety, and the environment, and the ability to leave minerals in the ground if they can not be developed safely. Broomfield’s revised regulations can ensure that these protections are in place.

However, the ongoing operations must also be closely monitored and the Operator Agreement must be enforced. Air quality is a top priority and as regulations move forward at the Air Quality Control Commissions (AQCC), as well as the COGCC, we must ensure these sites follow these new regulations,

#7
What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield?

Broomfield residents have been instrumental in bringing change both through increased awareness at the local level, as well as the passage of new state laws that provide greater protections. Despite the ongoing oil and gas operations that are now occurring in Broomfield near our residential communities, we are making progress. We must remain engaged as we participate in state rulemakings to ensure SB181 is thoroughly implemented at the State level, provide input to local regulations to ensure Proposition 301 is upheld, and remain vigilant and provide comments on any new operations that are proposed near our community. It is unfortunate that oil and gas has consumed so much of our time, but our community has grown strong and united and we must continue to persevere. We all look forward to moving past this issue so we can focus on our families and other issues that are critical to our community.

#1
Have you observed any impacts to Broomfield and local citizens due to the new oil and gas development pads, most notably the Interchange pads and the Livingston pad? If yes, what impacts have you observed? Have you reached out to impacted citizens to hear their stories?

The incoming oil and gas explorations in Broomfield, without a doubt, are some of the largest impacts heard in Broomfield and in the state. I remember being in city council chambers at 2am, when the former city council gave the head nod to a Memorandum of Understanding, allowing Extraction’s 84+ wells on encroaching mega pads near homes, schools, and future drinking water resources. We’ve had some major impacts since then, to include adverse impacts like stress on a community in the form of forced pooling and school evacuation drills. To add, I’ve been in homes of residents who report being forced to shut their windows, and have reported burning eyes, throats, and lungs. At the Livingston pad, due to the carcinogenic drilling mud that was causing their children to gag, I was proud of our citizens who alerted the COGCC to shut down drilling operations due to the medical emergency with over 50 complaints in 4 days. In addition, financially, when we learned that we are losing money on this project to the tune of millions of dollars, it affects all of us. Broomfield is the reason why we had SB-181 as well, and their impacted stories affected new laws.

#2
What is your position on oil and gas development on citizen-funded open space? 

I was appalled that our latest city council didn’t even open up this option to give the residents a say in how their open space was going to be affected by oil and gas explorations in the future. We have the right to protect open space from oil and gas encroachment and give the citizens the right to protect wildlife, their buffer zones, and uphold their home values. Once oil and gas lands in open spaces, its value changes and the taxpayers will be left to foot the bill of the cleanup. 

#3
What, if anything, do you think the City and County of Broomfield could do better to minimize the impacts of oil and gas development on the citizens of Broomfield?

It is very important to maintain and enforce the contract with Extraction and then leverage Senate Bill 181. For our current plans, we need to measure Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on a consistent basis and not average the air quality data. I pushed for the change in drilling mud after the Livingston complaints, and it’s important to use Neoflo now and have that in writing from Extraction that they will use it on the rest of the pads. For our open space, we must push for our open space to be remediated to its native grasses, and to keep an eye on leaking wells. Since oil and gas cannot promise their wells don’t ever leak, we will be needing to keep an eye on what they leave behind. Also of note, oil and gas developments are the primary source of VOC’s in our area, so we must take a hard look at any future developments and their contribution to harmful VOC’s which induce harmful ozone days.

#4
What is your perception of SB 181? How do you plan to leverage the power given to local municipalities in light of the new state law?

I am most excited about the fact that we have a new mission to actually regulate an industry to protect what we know and love, versus support an industry’s “financial feasibility”. This bill brought local control, a redefinition of waste in that it’s not considered waste if oil and gas is left in the ground, and an opportunity to use the precautionary principle to “do no harm”. 

#5

What will you do to ensure and/or increase transparency on the part of CCOB regarding oil and gas issues, allowing citizens to be apprised of information, impacts, and changes on a consistent basis? 

It’s been my honor to work with Physicians for Social Responsibility Colorado and the Medical Symposium Education Committee over the past year. The MSEC brought over 200 medical personnel from all over the state to learn about the health impacts of oil and gas on February 1st, 2019, and we partnered with the Colorado School of Public Health and the Colorado State University Environmental Justice Working Group. The videos can be found here for reference and it took place at CSU during an all-day event: https://vimeo.com/album/5847996  Also, I am the founder of the Broomfield Moms Active Community where many of us are being force pooled and understand the risks. One of the ideas brought forth was a “Health Notice” to be sent to those within a .8 mile radius, or further, to disclose the health and financial risks. We feel our current situation is akin to buying cigarettes without the warning label. Here is what we propose: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fDjT11si5VLOenKdkDgL2gb0pwYhHa8E/view?usp=sharing

We are hoping to also develop an app that supports people in reporting health/safety/air quality impacts “vertically” to the city/county, CDPHE, AQCC and the COGCC and then also “horizontally” to those in the area who also subscribe to the app, with their personal information redacted. I also find it paramount to keep the people of Broomfield apprised of any and all information when it comes to oil and gas and this includes emails, emergency systems, and mailings.

#6
Given the passage of 301 and the prioritization of “Health and Safety” in the charter of Broomfield, what steps will you take as an elected official to ensure that the health and safety of Broomfield citizens is your top priority? 

We must uphold 301. We can uphold 301 with SB181. And, we will be steadfast in our goal of “no adverse impacts”. It’s been a long time due to update our local regulations and we must uphold our charter consistently and closely as it’s been our residents who have told us time and time again to elevate the health and safety of its residents. The onus is on oil and gas to prove they have no adverse impacts so that we can follow our law.

#7
What message do you have for Broomfield citizens who are concerned about large-scale oil and gas development in Broomfield? 

It’s been stressful enough to have oil and gas encroachment in Broomfield, let alone all along the front range, but I’m willing to go to bat for you and I hope to earn your vote. My website is here: www.heidihenkelbroomfield.com I also have endorsed Kevin Kreeger for mayor, and it’s my hope we have more transparency in government to serve you further when it comes to oil and gas and its impacts.